Historic Victory for Press Freedom at the European Court of Human Rights
WPFC Applauds Decision Ruling for Spanish Journalist José Luis Gutiérrez
He Is Vindicated after 15 Years of Judicial Harassment in Spain
He Is Vindicated after 15 Years of Judicial Harassment in Spain
Washington, USA, June 1, 2010 — The World Press Freedom Committee of Freedom House —an umbrella organization representing 45 press freedom groups from throughout the world— applauds the European Court of Human Rights' decision vindicating Spanish journalist José Luis Gutiérrez (below) and chastising the Spanish State for violating Article 10 of the European Convention.
(WPFC photo)
Article 10 protects the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of the press. The Court today ruled “the restriction on the applicant’s freedom of expression had not been proportionate to the potential seriousness of the damage to the reputation in question.”
The case started back in 1995 when the now-defunct Diario 16 newspaper published a story under the headline “A family company belonging to Hassan II implicated in drug trafficking” about the police seizure of close to 5 tons of hashish hidden in a truck belonging to Domaines Royaux, a property of the Moroccan royal family.
In 1997, the Moroccan Royal Crown filed a suit in a Madrid court against the writer of the article, Rosa María López, the editor-in-chief of Diario 16, Mr. Gutiérrez, and the publishing company, alleging that the article had “interfered with the fundamental right to respect for the king’s reputation.” The court ruled for the plaintiff sentencing Mr. Gutiérrez and Diario 16 to pay a fine and publish the ruling in his newspaper. Once the newspaper went bankrupt, Mr. Gutiérrez remained the sole defendant.
He appealed three times, including to the land’s top court , the Constitutional Tribunal, but they all upheld the original ruling despite the overwhelming support Gutiérrez garnered from international press freedom organizations, including WPFC.
Finally, in 2007, he took his civil insult case to the European Court with the support of WPFC —which submitted an amicus curiae brief on his behalf— and several other members of the Coordinating Committee of Press Freedom Organizations, such as the Committee to Protect Journalists, the International Press Freedom Institute, the World Association of Newspapers and the Inter-American Press Association.
The Court's ruling (only available in French) is unequivocal in its support for Mr. Gutiérrez’s fundamental right to free speech, stating that, “The information in question was a matter of general interest. The Spanish public had the right to be informed about drug trafficking in which the Moroccan royal family appeared to be involved, a matter that had moreover been the subject of an investigation before the Spanish criminal courts.”
Also, noting that the Spanish courts took issue with the way the article’s headline was written, the Court pointed out that “it was not its task, or that of the domestic courts, to determine which journalistic techniques should be used and that journalistic freedom covered recourse to a degree of exaggeration.”
The ruling also rejects the Spanish courts’ notion that the journalist was obligated to research the story further on her own.
“Furthermore,” the ruling reads, “the author of the article had made reference to information available to her at the time. Provided that journalists acted in good faith and that the information imparted was true, they could not be expected –at the risk of compromising the vital role of ‘public watchdog’ of the press– to undertake independent research.”
“We welcome the European Court decision as a vindication for Mr. Gutiérrez, who has been the target of judicial harassment for 15 years”, said WPFC’s Projects Director Javier Sierra. “We find it outrageous that it took such a long period of time and a reprimand from the European Court for Mr. Gutiérrez finally to get justice. We hope the Spanish State will learn this lesson and start once and for all reforming the obsolete laws that were used to sentence Mr. Gutiérrez.”
Those statutes are the 1982 Protection of Honor Law, which includes the figure of civil insult, and the 1966 Press and Printing Law, which was inherited from the Franco Dictatorship. Even though the spirit and the letter of both laws contravene internationally accepted press freedom standards, they both remain in the books as a Damocles sword pending over the heads of Spanish journalists.
“This sentence is an excellent show of support for press freedom and freedom of expression,” said Mr. Gutiérrez. “And it comes out precisely when the concept of press freedom is the target of so many totalitarian and undemocratic forces. It also agrees with all the press freedom and human rights organizations that supported me and denounced the laws that were used to indict me, including Franco’s Press and Printing Law. I thank all of them, starting with the World Press Freedom Committee, the first one who supported me, the International Press Institute and the rest of the members of the Coordinating Committee of Press Freedom Organizations who backed me up at the European Court.”
The World Press Freedom Committee of Freedom House is an international umbrella organization that includes 45 journalistic groups —print and broadcast, labor and management, journalists, editors, publishers and owners on five continents— united in the defense and promotion of press freedom. The WPFC primarily focuses on monitoring threats that develop at UNESCO, the UN and other parts of the UN system; promoting a global common front against restrictions on news through leadership of a worldwide Coordinating Committee of Press Freedom Organizations. WPFC also focuses on the reform or elimination of insult and criminal defamation laws, considered powerful censorship tools used to stifle the news media throughout the world.
Print





















This is one of the most interesting debate for human rights in the history of England. I was thrilled when Mr. Gutiérrez took over when the paper filed for bankruptcy. I just couldn't wait to see what he's bound to do.
Posted by: bankruptcy attorney phoenix | February 03, 2012 at 12:36 AM