Nokia Siemens Answers Back to Critics in Iran, Including Us
Nokia Siemens is hitting back on critics who said this world communications giant was cooperating with the Iranian regime to put down the on-going pro-democracy demonstrations.
And the way it's doing it is by claiming that the company is following standard procedures in that country and that it "has not provided any deep packet inspection, web censorship or Internet filtering capability to Iran."
Here:
To fulfill this Lawful Intercept requirement as part of an expansion to provide further mobile connectivity to Iran in the second half of 2008, Nokia Siemens Networks provided TCI, the Iranian national operator, with the capability to conduct voice monitoring of local calls on its fixed and mobile network.
The restricted functionality monitoring center provided by Nokia Siemens Networks in Iran cannot provide data monitoring, internet monitoring, deep packet inspection, international call monitoring or speech recognition. Therefore, contrary to speculation in the media, the technology supplied by Nokia Siemens Networks cannot be used for the monitoring or censorship of internet traffic.
On March 31st, 2009 Nokia Siemens Networks and Perusa Partners Fund I L.P., a private investment firm advised by Munich based Perusa GmbH, successfully closed the sale of Nokia Siemens Networks’ Intelligence Solutions business to Perusa. Nokia Siemens Networks made the decision to exit this business as it primarily addresses customer segments which differ from telecom service providers and is therefore not part of Nokia Siemens Networks core business.
In all countries where it operates the company does business strictly in accordance with the Nokia Siemens Networks Code of Conduct and in full compliance with UN and EU export control regulations and other applicable laws and regulations.
Nokia Siemens Networks provides the mobile technology for millions of people in Iran to communicate with each other and the outside world. Nokia Siemens Networks firmly believes that providing people, wherever they are, with the ability to communicate ultimately benefits societies and brings greater prosperity.
Such a fine line it is that by which we all can hold a corporation responsible for the misdeeds of a regime. Then the line moves back and forth, and one wonders whether that corporation should have been doing business in that country in the first place.
Decisions, decisions.
Print





















Comments